Match equity table with MWC

Most people show match-winning chance (MWC) in their match equity table instead of equity. Of course the standard conversion of equity = 2 MWC - 1 holds. Here are my calculated match equity tables showing MWC:

	1-away	2-away	3-away	4-away	5-away	6-away	7-away	8-away	9-away	10-away	11-away	12-away
1-away	50	68.1	75.5	81.7	84.5	89.0	91.0	93.5	94.6	96.1	96.8	97.7
2-away		50	59.5	66.1	73.6	79.2	83.4	86.7	89.4	91.7	93.4	94.8
3-away			50	57.0	64.5	70.8	75.6	79.8	83.3	86.4	88.9	90.9
4-away				50	57.4	63.9	69.2	73.7	77.9	81.5	84.5	87.0
5-away					50	56.6	62.2	67.2	71.8	75.9	79.4	82.5
6-away						50	55.9	61.1	66.0	70.4	74.4	77.8
7-away							50	55.2	60.4	65.0	69.2	73.0
8-away								50	55.2	59.9	64.3	68.3
9-away									50	54.8	59.4	63.6
10-away										50	54.6	58.9
11-away											50	54.3
12-away												50

I left out the bottom half of the table for readability, but all values there are just 100 less the corresponding value in the top half.


And here are the corresponding post-Crawford MWCs (for player n-away, opponent 1-away):

	1-away	2-away	3-away	4-away	5-away	6-away	7-away	8-away	9-away	10-away	11-away	12-away
1-away	50	48.6	31.9	30.6	18.7	17.7	11.3	10.6	6.7	6.3	4.0	3.7

These compare well to the "Mec26" MWC table here, mostly within 0.2%. Those are based on GNUbg rollouts for post-Crawford MWCs and using a gammon probability of 26.0% (vs 27.6% in mine). The biggest differences are in 1-away,2-away and 1-away,3-away where the MWC is different by about 0.5%.

Another modern MET is the G11 table. Again, not much difference between my calculated MET and this one, though bigger differences (especially near the diagonal) than with Mec26.