tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4837627029742618106.post752396932900649338..comments2016-12-23T17:17:02.688-08:00Comments on Computational Backgammon: Jump model final version postedMark Higginshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16878070026852488955noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4837627029742618106.post-47338820094512655612016-02-21T10:46:50.181-08:002016-02-21T10:46:50.181-08:00Hi! In the end I was underwhelmed by this model. I...Hi! In the end I was underwhelmed by this model. It's a nice way of thinking about game evolution, but the right jump volatility depends a lot on game state, and it's hard to estimate. So getting anything better in practice than the original Janowski approximation is a lot of work. Mark Higginshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16878070026852488955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4837627029742618106.post-12671846494061357332016-02-21T03:22:12.699-08:002016-02-21T03:22:12.699-08:00Hi again Mark!
I'm finally trying to develop m...Hi again Mark!<br />I'm finally trying to develop my own doubling algorithm for a bot of mine. At first glance I actually like this model. I have browsed your model paper and so far I like what I see. I will study this further. Sorry the late response. 4 years only. :-)Øystein Schønning-Johansenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13432607600680027833noreply@blogger.com